Vein of Galen Malformations in adults.

OBJECTIVE: Vein of Galen Malformations (VoGM) are rare vascular malformations, typically seen in pediatric age groups. Even more rarely, VoGM's may be seen later in adulthood. In this case report and systematic review, we provide a thorough description of the current literature as well as provide a case example exploring the diagnosis, imaging, treatment, and management of VoGM in adults. METHODS: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, we performed a systematic literature search for all relevant cases and case series of VoGM in adult patients. The reference list of all articles were reviewed for additional relevant cases. Articles were included if they described a VoGM of a patient over the age of 18 years old and published in English. 149 articles were originally identified and 26 described cases met our inclusion criteria. RESULTS: In our literature review we found 26 patients that met our inclusion criteria. We found 14 male patients and 12 female patients. The mean age at presentation was 37.2 years (median=34 years, SD= 13.6 years). The most common presenting symptoms of patient were headache (n = 9), seizure (n = 6), and vomiting (n = 4). Of the 12 cases which clearly reported the subtype of VoGM, the choroidal type was more frequently seen (n = 10) compared to the mural type (n = 2). In 3 patients, the VoGM was thrombosed at time of diagnosis. Of the 26 patients, endovascular treatment was performed most frequently (n = 8) but some received microsurgical treatment (n = 4) or were treated conservatively (n = 6). Other treatment modalities included (ventriculoperitoneal shunt, ventriculostomy) (n = 5). In 3 cases treatment was not specified. In comparison to VoGM seen in pediatric or neonatal populations, VoGM in adults generally resulted in more favorable outcomes with only 2 patients reported to have passed away following treatment. CONCLUSION: VoGM remains a rare finding amongst the adult population. Hence, we described the clinical presentation, treatment modalities, and outcomes of the cases described in the English literature. Perhaps due to the rate of thrombosis and the unique angioarchitecture seen in adult VoGM patients, outcomes were generally more favorable than those described in the literature in pediatric or neonate VoGM patients.

The Return Back to Typical Practice from the "Battle Plan" of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: Every aspect of the medical field has been heavily affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, and neurosurgical services are no exception. Several departments have reported their experiences and protocols to provide insights for others impacted. The goals of this study are to report the load and variety of neurosurgical cases and clinic visits after discontinuing the COVID-19 Battle Plan at an academic tertiary care referral center to provide insights for other departments going through the same transition. METHODS: The clinical data of all patients who underwent a neurosurgical intervention between May 4, 2020, and June 4, 2020 were obtained from a prospectively maintained database. Data of the control group were retrospectively collected from the medical records to compare the types of surgeries/interventions and clinic visits performed by the same neurosurgical service before the COVID-19 pandemic started. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-one patients underwent neurosurgical interventions, and seven-hundred one patients were seen in clinic appointments, in the 4-week period following easing back from our COVID-19 "Battle Plan." Discontinuing the "Battle Plan" resulted in increases in case load to above-average practice after a week but a continued decrease in clinic appointments throughout the 4 weeks compared with average practice. CONCLUSIONS: As policy-shaping crises like pandemics abate, easing back to "typical" practice can be completed effectively by appropriately allocating resources. This can be accomplished by anticipating increases in neurosurgical volume, specifically in the functional/epilepsy and brain tumor subspecialties, as well as continued decreases in neurosurgical clinic volume, specifically in elective spine.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Neurosurgical Practice at an Academic Tertiary Referral Center: A Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: Neurosurgical services have been affected by the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, and several departments have reported their experiences and responses to the COVID-19 crisis in an attempt to provide insights from which other impacted departments can benefit. The goals of this study were to report the load and variety of emergent/urgent neurosurgical cases after implementing the "Battle Plan" at an academic tertiary referral center during the COVID-19 pandemic and to compare these variables with previous practice at the same institution. METHODS: The clinical data of all patients who underwent a neurosurgical intervention between March 23, 2020, and April 20, 2020, were obtained from a prospectively maintained database. Data of the control group were retrospectively collected from the medical records to compare the types of surgeries/interventions performed by the same neurosurgical service before the COVID-19 pandemic started. RESULTS: Over a 4-week period during the COVID-19 pandemic, 91 patients underwent emergent, urgent, and essential neurosurgical interventions. Patient screening at teleclinics identified 11 urgent surgical cases. The implementation of the Battle Plan led to a significant decrease in the caseload, and the variation of cases by subspecialty was evident when compared with a control group comprising 214 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Delivery of optimal care and safe practice and education at an academic neurosurgical department can be well maintained with proper execution of crisis protocols. Teleclinics proved to be efficient in screening patients for urgent neurosurgical conditions, but in-person clinic visits may still be necessary for some cases in the immediate postoperative period.